A biomedical engineer at the University of Houston (UH) is working to develop highly innovative technology to make blood transfusions safer. His work is supported by a $1.8 million grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Blood transfusions save millions of lives every year. They are one of modern medicine’s absolute necessities. Without them, for instance, routine surgeries would become life threatening. This doesn’t mean transfusions are perfect, however. There’s strong evidence that transfusions of red blood cells stored in a refrigerator for prolonged periods of time can be dangerous or even deadly for some patients.
This is because patients get more than just healthy, well-preserved red blood cells during a transfusion. They also get a number of potentially harmful materials. Materials beyond the needed red blood cells include the anticoagulant-preservative solution that keeps the blood cells alive during storage, as well as cells that have been irreparably damaged by processing the blood after donation and during storage.
Additional materials include the remnants of burst cells, including free hemoglobin and microparticles that can contribute to inflammation and the formation of blood clots, as well as the byproducts of cellular metabolism, which is essentially cellular waste. The longer blood is in storage, the more these potentially harmful materials build up.
“Therapeutically, there’s absolutely no reason to transfer any of this into the patient,” said Sergey Shevkoplyas, associate professor of biomedical engineering with UH’s Cullen College of Engineering. “The only thing you need to transfuse into the patient is well-preserved red blood cells. There’s no point to giving you these other potentially toxic materials.”
Shevkoplyas is working under an NIH Director’s Transformative Research Award to develop a simple device to separate healthy, well-preserved red blood cells from all the other material in the blood bag just before transfusion. Such grants support high-risk/high-reward projects with potentially transformative impacts.
The system Shevkoplyas is developing will consist of two tubes that feed into a plastic device just a few inches in size. One tube will send blood into the device, while another will send saline solution. In the first step, the saline will wash harmful particles and the storage solution off the healthy red blood cells. Next, the entire mixture will be sent through an array of precisely designed microfluidic channels, where the shape, size and flexibility of healthy red blood cells will allow them to be separated from the particles, damaged cells and storage solution. At that point, the healthy red blood cells, along with saline acting as a transport medium, can be transfused safely into the patient.
Shevkoplyas emphasizes this will be no easy task, since microfluidic research usually involves fluids flowing through channels measuring less than a millimeter, with devices that can handle just a few drops per hour. With its series of interconnected channels, Shevkoplyas’ device aims to scale these microfluidic interactions up a thousand fold.
“That’s the big challenge,” Shevkoplyas said. “Adapting our understanding of microfluidics to a high-throughput device is not very simple, though we do have some good data to show we can do it.”
While Shevkoplyas’ system faces significant scientific and engineering hurdles, one of its biggest advantages is just how practical it is. The materials he will use to build the device, like the saline solution, are already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This significantly reduces the burden for regulatory approvals, which should help keep the cost of the system at around $50 and allow it to come to market sooner.
Additionally, health care systems worldwide already have invested billions of dollars into existing blood storage and transfusion practices. Using the device Shevkoplyas plans to create won’t require any significant changes to these practices. Instead, the small, disposable device would be placed between the blood bag and the patient during transfusion, completely at the discretion of the patient’s care team.
Together, these features make it much more likely that Shevkoplyas’ device will move from the lab to clinical use, where it can have a positive impact on patient health.
“We’re trying to fit as much of this technology as we can into the existing paradigm of transfusion. We want to empower medical professionals at the scene to make the decision about using this system,” Shevkoplyas said. “You cannot save people’s lives without blood transfusions. We’re just trying to make this life-saving procedure as safe as possible.”